AI is moving faster than security teams can keep up — and 59% say AI risks outpace their expertise. Vanta's new State of Trust report surveyed 3,500 business and IT leaders across the globe to reveal how organizations are navigating this growing gap.
The data reveals:
61% of teams spend more time proving security than improving it
AI-driven attacks are growing bigger, faster, and more sophisticated
Nearly half of leaders say AI gives them time for strategic security workApple reportedly finalized plans to deploy a custom 1.2T parameter version of Google's Gemini model for its long-delayed Siri overhaul, according to Bloomberg — committing roughly $1B annually to license the technology.
The details:
Gemini will handle summarization and multi-step planning within Siri, running on Apple's Private Cloud Compute infrastructure to keep user info private.
Apple also trialed models from OpenAI and Anthropic, with the 1.2T parameter count far exceeding the 150B used in the current Apple Intelligence model.
Bloomberg said the partnership is “unlikely to be promoted publicly”, with Apple intending for Google to be a “behind-the-scenes” tech supplier.
The new Siri could arrive as soon as next Spring, with Apple planning to use Gemini as a stopgap while it builds its own capable internal model.Why it matters: After years of delays and uncertainty around Siri’s upgrade, Gemini is the model set to bring the voice assistant into the AI world (at least in some capacity). Apple views the move as temporary, but building its own solution, considering the company’s struggles and employee exodus, certainly doesn’t feel like a given.
- Virtual computers for AI agents. Let them create files, browse the web, and install or use any desktop app.
20% of American adults have had an intimate experience with a chatbot. Online communities now feature tens of thousands of users sharing stories of AI proposals and digital marriages. The subreddit r/MyBoyfriendisAI has grown to over 85,000 members, and MIT researchers found such relationships can significantly reduce loneliness by offering round-the-clock support. The Times profiles three middle-aged users who credit their AI partners with easing depression, trauma, and marital strain.
Industry leaders should ensure that technical staff understand the project purpose and domain context: Misunderstandings and miscommunications about the intent and purpose of the project are the most common reasons for AI project failure. Industry leaders should choose enduring problems: AI projects require time and patience to complete. Before they begin any AI project, leaders should be prepared to commit each product team to solving a specific problem for at least a year. Industry leaders should focus on the problem, not the technology: Successful projects are laser-focused on the problem to be solved, not the technology used to solve it. Industry leaders should invest in infrastructure: Up-front investments in infrastructure to support data governance and model deployment can reduce the time required to complete AI projects and can increase the volume of high-quality data available to train effective AI models. Industry leaders should understand AI's limitations: When considering a potential AI project, leaders need to include technical experts to assess the project's feasibility. Academia leaders should overcome data-collection barriers through partnerships with government: Partnerships between academia and government agencies could give researchers access to data of the provenance needed for academic research. Academia leaders should expand doctoral programs in data science for practitioners: Computer science and data science program leaders should learn from disciplines, such as international relations, in which practitioner doctoral programs often exist side by side at universities to provide pathways for researchers to apply their findings to urgent problems.